tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1742875340359980279.post3403704765198896408..comments2014-07-10T14:00:01.950-07:00Comments on Choosing Hats: Is it sinful to call evidentialism...sinful?Brian Knapphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09343706473535031469noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1742875340359980279.post-24086655083348568882008-08-30T16:57:00.000-07:002008-08-30T16:57:00.000-07:00Yeah, I'm not sure what Micah was getting at there...Yeah, I'm not sure what Micah was getting at there...As Brian noted, Dr White is presuppositional, not evidentialist...Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18343310535708699841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1742875340359980279.post-72762026101672996132008-08-25T21:29:00.000-07:002008-08-25T21:29:00.000-07:00I want to make it very clear too that this post re...I want to make it very clear too that this post really has nothing to do with James White. The only reason the name was ever mentioned was because of the term "cage-stage" cited from the original blog post that this one deals with.<BR/><BR/>I say this because I have been warned by others much wiser than myself that people often set out to attack the man whenever his name is brought up on blogs, Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1742875340359980279.post-50827023139628800332008-08-25T19:25:00.000-07:002008-08-25T19:25:00.000-07:00The obvious answer is no, because I have not met D...The obvious answer is no, because I have not met Dr. White in person, but I do not think that is what you mean.<BR/><BR/>Is this a point where Dr. White is in disagreement with Dr. Bahnsen? I am just not sure what you are getting at.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1742875340359980279.post-16800845022178707052008-08-25T17:39:00.000-07:002008-08-25T17:39:00.000-07:00Hey Micah!I haven't told Dr. White this personally...Hey Micah!<BR/><BR/>I haven't told Dr. White this personally to his face (I have never met him, actually), nor do I think Chris has. Then again, I don't think it would matter as Dr. White is presuppositional.<BR/><BR/>By the way - putting aside whether Dr. White would or would not be offended, what are <I>your</I> thoughts about this post? Do you believe that Chris is correct in his assessment?Brian Knapphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09343706473535031469noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1742875340359980279.post-67545715407782566982008-08-25T17:26:00.000-07:002008-08-25T17:26:00.000-07:00Don't you think it's a bit of an equivocation to q...Don't you think it's a bit of an equivocation to quote a whole paragraph, and use one line to reply, hinging the entire objection on a single word - "that"?RazorsKisshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04196172455018273851noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1742875340359980279.post-3109157386681174062008-08-25T16:05:00.000-07:002008-08-25T16:05:00.000-07:00"However, we should never submit to a philosophy f..."However, we should never submit to a philosophy found outside of Christ Jesus, and evidentialism as an apologetic method is such a philosophy. Thus it is sin to use the evidentialist method of apologetics. Those who still disagree may be doing so based upon a different definition of evidentialist apologetics which should lead to further discussion on this subject."<BR/><BR/>Wow, have you told DrLockheedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05433104440503646253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1742875340359980279.post-58027341383075971612008-08-25T08:35:00.000-07:002008-08-25T08:35:00.000-07:00Calvin Dude is also known as Peter Pike over at Tr...Calvin Dude is also known as Peter Pike over at Triablogue.Andrew Schumacherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06553828200280746250noreply@blogger.com