tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1742875340359980279.post8644567506963150805..comments2014-07-10T14:00:01.950-07:00Comments on Choosing Hats: All Bethrick All The TimeBrian Knapphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09343706473535031469noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1742875340359980279.post-81407265677907333732009-09-02T23:59:46.171-07:002009-09-02T23:59:46.171-07:00Chris: “Of course, circular definitions are defini...Chris: “Of course, circular definitions are definitions which are circular. I do not see that Bethrick ever actually defines what he means by previous validation in a non-circular way”<br /><br />Circularity is a flaw in argumentation, not definitions. Definitions are not arguments. There’s no such thing as a “circular definition.” Also, what I gave was not a definition, but a description. I was Bahnsen Burnerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11030029491768748360noreply@blogger.com